How to Let an Employee Go: A Clear Three-Part Script
Episode #142 Host: Tammy J. Bond
When the decision to end employment has been made, the termination meeting is not the place to reopen the case, unload months of frustration, or use extra words to make the leader feel better.
It is the moment to be clear, factual, brief, and human.
In Episode 142, Tammy J. Bond gives leaders a practical three-part structure for communicating a termination decision. She explains why leaders must name behavior rather than attack the person, why documentation and clear expectations must exist before the final conversation, and how to explain what happens next without turning the meeting into a negotiation.
The hard truth? The meeting is rarely the hardest part. The hardest part is often the story the leader built during the month they spent avoiding it.
Episode Summary
Episode 142 addresses one of leadership’s most uncomfortable responsibilities: communicating a decision to end someone’s employment.
Tammy distinguishes a final-decision meeting from an earlier coaching or corrective conversation. A termination should never be manufactured by vague expectations, missing documentation, inconsistent accountability, or a leader’s unspoken assumptions.
Once the organization has properly reviewed and made the decision, Tammy recommends a three-part conversation: state the decision clearly, give a concise fact-based reason, and explain the next steps. She warns against opening with small talk, apologizing for the decision, blaming others, overexplaining, or filling the silence to regulate the leader’s discomfort.
The central insight is direct: when leaders keep talking after clarity has been delivered, they are often comforting themselves—not the person receiving the news.
Key Takeaways
A termination meeting is not a performance-coaching conversation. The decision must be reviewed and final before the meeting begins.
Opening with “How do you think things are going?” can invite negotiation about a decision that is no longer open.
Expectations, feedback, performance standards, documentation, policy compliance, consistency, and legal risk must be reviewed before termination.
Name the observable behavior or unmet requirement—not personality, character, motives, or worth.
State the decision first, without a long runway of small talk.
Give the reason concisely and support it with facts already documented and reviewed.
Explain what happens next: effective date, pay process, benefits, property, access, belongings, and the designated follow-up contact.
Severance is not universal; use only the terms approved for that employee and situation.
Do not apologize to distance yourself from a properly reviewed decision or blame someone else for making it.
Silence after clarity is not cruelty. Unnecessary language often serves the leader’s discomfort.
A short termination meeting requires a long record of clear leadership before it.
Leadership Sandbox Podcast is brought to you by Tammy J. Bond
In today's swift-moving employee market leaders are far too often putting people that are technically good at their jobs into leadership positions, without first developing them on how to be leaders of people.
How do you course correct, or better yet make sure you don’t make that common mistake? Develop your people to lead others from the moment they join your team. For more tools on how to develop others around you, contact us today. We'd love for you to join us for our next episodes by tuning in on Apple Podcast, Amazon Podcast, or Spotify.